Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Correlation Between Student Incomes and Student- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theCorrelation Between Student Incomes and Student Services. Answer: Introduction MacEwan provided services are set in place to help students through the many challenges and obstacles that students face while attending university. These services range anywhere from sexual violence to providing services for students facing learning disabilities. One topic of interest however, is a students level of income and how it can play into the effectiveness of the services provided by learning institutions. It is important to understand the effect these services have on students who make different incomes while going to school. By understanding the difference between high-income students and low-income students it will help us to determine if the services provided by MacEwan are reaching their intended audiences. In the following document we will provide an analysis of peer reviewed articles and their relation to our topic of interest. We will also provide an in-depth methodology report which will outline the research we are going to conduct in order to answer the following research question. Does a students level of income affect their use of MacEwan provided services? In addition, we will provide a timeline as to how we will go about collecting and organizing our data. Literature Review We began our literary searches with the goal of answering the question: how does student income affect how students use McEwan provided students. Blakes (article B) article focused on the relationship between the magnitudes of a students postsecondary funding and their program choice as well as course load for their first year at school. Charlies article (article C) investigates the ethics of whether it is the university's responsibility to provide students with Human Services as well as the magnitude of Human Services that it is reasonable to provide. These articles can be divided into two main categories. Article B and article C both pertain to how income and student funding affects the general student experience and article S focusses primarily on how a student's hereditary might have would affect their use of services and general performance in school. Three important observations can be taken from each of the two categories of literary reviews. The first and most important conclusion, is that funding seems to have a huge impact on a student choices at school and consequently the services that they end up using. Article B and C both make it very clear that income affects the choices that students make at school. In article B, it was found that the more leveraged a student was the more likely they were to have a declared major as well as choose a program in the STEM category. Secondly, there is more than just one issue that is affecting a students use of services. Article S evinces this with the finding that 90% of students did not think having a learning disability would stop them from pursuing their education and while 90% seems like a high number we must also take into account that it also means 10% of students would probably drop out or not even attempt post-secondary education if they believed they had a learning disability. The last take-away from all three literature review articles pertains to methodology. Originally, our group had planned on doing most of our research by way of anonymous surveys of hundreds of MacEwan students. However, after reading through all the articles one common theme emerged in regards to the methodologies that the authors of these articles used. They all conducted surveys as well as in persons interviews of dozens of people to collect their data. Knowing this, our group will be conducting a few in person interviews in addition to surveys in order to strengthen the quality of our research. All of these findings are encouraging for our research project because they appear to support our groups hypothesis that student income affects the services that students use at Grant MacEwan University. Article B and C reinforce that there is a relationship between the amount of funding students have access to and the choices they make at school and article S reminds us that although it may appear that income may be one of the most important aspects affecting how and what services a student uses it may not be the only factor. Methodology The article deeply talks about the students from low-level households. Therefore, to get better results we are thinking of conducting methods that will include some deep interviews with the groups of such students consisting of both males and females. Since this case is quite complex so, we are thinking to opt for a mixed method which will include both qualitative and qualitative type of inductive approach. Therefore, well go for choosing testing theory over conducting theory. Along with the students we will seek for some knowledgeable informants who can help us inquire the case satisfactorily. Further, the data can be collected by enrolling more interviewees to get better knowledge about their backgrounds until a theoretical saturation is achieved. Moreover, we will collect data in a cross-sectional manner by conducting a questionnaire referring to one current point in time which includes face to face casual conversations. Also, we will e-mail our friends and classmates to get more information to get good results for our survey. For this survey, we estimate to interview and cross-question at least 50 students or even more who study in Grant MacEwan University. Therefore, if we will be successful in collecting data without any internal or external interruptions, then further we will look forward to presenting the whole survey in a statistical manner. Timeline Conclusion In reference to the literature review (the articles BC and S, we can develop an insight of the findings that are likely to come up from the research studies. As seen before, all the articles reviewed have a positive correlation with our research hypothesis. The articles, B and C all have it that the financial status of the students directly affect their use of the institution provided services. It is typically certain that students choices on the type of services they use is substantially influenced by their socio-economic status in accordance to the reviewed literature. We also establish that, apart from just the financial status of the students, there are a number of issues that affect the type of services that a student chooses, which among others, included the learning disabilities. The likely gaps that would weaken reliability of the report have already been discovered in the methodology section. Making use of interview alongside survey gives a guarantee of dependable results We can surely establish that in the proposed research, we have over 70% of the likely findings and therefore we can briefly conclude that the research study will produce a highly reliable results since the methodology will deeply exploit the primary study population to establish concrete findings. Reference List Cady, C. (2012). Discussing Poverty as a Student Issue: Making a Case for Student Human Services. Journal of College and Character, 13(3), 4. doi: 10.1515/jcc-2012-1908 Cady, C (n.d.). Linked In profile. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/in/clare-cady-81b66257/ Miller, A., Zhang, L. (2009). The Effects of Welfare Reform on the Academic Performance of Children in Low- Income Households, 28(4), 577-599. doi: 10.1002/pam

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.