Credit Card and Paypal

In this report, we focus on all aspects of the PayPal business. PayPal Basics PayPal is quickly establishing itself as a global payment processor with scale, facilitating nearly $60B in Total Payment Volume in 2008. It remains the largest player focused solely on online payments; however when compared to the total volume of large global players, such as Visa and MasterCard, PayPal’s volume remains fairly small: its $60B TPV was just over 1% of the total volume of payments processed last year by Visa and MasterCard combined. Figure 1: PayPal’s Volume Dwarfed by Incumbents in billions 2,000 1,500 1,757 1,548 969 1,000 500 0 Visa (Credit) Visa (Debit) MasterCard (Credit) Source: Company reports, J. P. Morgan estimates. Note: Parts of PayPal volume may be processed using Visa or MasterCard’s network; Visa volume excludes Visa Europe 406 60 MasterCard (Debit) Pay Pal PayPal is an Established Payment Network and Brand – A Rare Commodity PayPal is in rare company , successfully creating itself into a formidable payment network and brand alongside dominant payment brands in Visa, MasterCard, American Express and Discover.Payment networks sit at the top of the value chain in payments, collecting high-margin fees for facilitating payments from participants seeking access to a network of trusted merchants and consumers. PayPal overcame the classic chicken-and-egg dilemma and now has a critical mass of users in its network, differentiated as a trusted brand for facilitating online payments with the potential to extend its presence into offline opportunities longer-term.One driver of PayPal’s growth is that, unlike traditional payment methods which developed in an offline world and have been overlaid onto eCommerce, PayPal’s platform was built with eCommerce in mind. As such, PayPal has developed tools and risk management measures to address the unique complexities of handling card not present payments over the web – one of th e fastest growth categories in payments. Moreover, PayPal is elegantly structured to simplify the web of connections required in a traditional payment system, making it well positioned to penetrate the small business payments market. Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 Figure 2: PayPal Simplifies the Payment Process Traditional payment structure Merchant Payment gateway provider Merchant bank Source: J. P. Morgan. PayPal payment structure Merchant Consumer Consumer Card issuer processor Card-issuing bank Merchant bank Consumer bank We think the online marketplace, and sellers in particular, benefit from this simplification in several ways: †¢ Ease of Use.PayPal gives virtually anyone the capacity to accept payments, enabling a merchant to operate even at an initial scale that would otherwise be uneconomical (i. e. , there are no minimum requirements for payment volume in order to use PayPal. ) Higher level of trust. The payments system is not very transparent, and not all aspects were intended for mass use. A trusted central clearinghouse like PayPal can encourage use of online payments by lowering users’ safety concerns and raising their willingness to send money online. †¢PayPal Is Differentiated beyond Just Online Commerce PayPal is different from other payment brands (e. g. MasterCard, Visa) in that it is a vertically integrated payment provider. In other words, PayPal is a single source provider of payment services. By contracting directly with PayPal Merchant Services, small merchants can get all of their payment needs, and do not necessarily need a separate merchant bank account or payment gateway services provider. PayPal is gradually expanding its presence off eBay by promoting itself as an integrated payment offering along side other payment brands (e. . MasterCard, Visa), supported by PayPal ’s own merchant services offering and alliances with payment vendors like CyberSource (payment gateway) and Chase Paymentech (largest merchant acquirer in the U. S. ). PayPal’s Product Offerings for Online Sellers PayPal offers several different products for payment acceptance, based on the size and needs of the merchant: †¢ Email product. This is the offering used largely by smaller eBay merchants, who receive payments entirely via e-mail, with no site of their own on which they need to integrate PayPal. Website Payments Standard.This product allows merchants to place a PayPal button on their site, and when a user is ready to check out, the user hits the button and is taken to the PayPal site where the actual checkout occurs. †¢ 4 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 †¢ Website Payments Pro. With an incremental $ 30 monthly fee, the Pro product is better integrated into a seller’s site. The product is intended for small- to medium-size sellers, and requires the seller to be using a compatible hopping cart vendor (most are compatible). Express Checkout. Intended for larger merchants (those already accepting include Dell and Barnes & Noble). Express Checkout is incremental to the payment acceptance service used by a vendor – it gives users an additional checkout option. When a shopper uses Express Checkout, s/he logs into PayPal, and PayPal then forwards address and other info to the merchant. This allows an existing PayPal user to bypass entering personal and shipping information again, even if it is the user’s first time using the specific merchant. †¢ Strong Growth in Active UsersBy continuing to add users across multiple platforms, PayPal has been able to post strong user growth in recent quarters, even despite the slowdown in on-eBay growth and low-single-digit u ser growth on the eBay site itself: Figure 3: PayPal Active User Growth Strong in Recent Quarters Users in Millions 150 100 50 26. 7% 23. 7% 20. 7% 19. 6% 18. 6% 19. 2% 17. 7% 16. 3% 16. 1% 16. 0% 17. 3% 22. 9% 21. 4% 30% 20% 10% 73 70 65 63 60 57 53 55 51 47 49 45 44 0 0% 1Q'06 2Q'06 3Q'06 4Q'06 1Q'07 2Q'07 3Q'07 4Q'07 1Q'08 2Q'08 3Q'08 4Q'08 1Q'09 Pay Pal Activ e Accounts Y/Y Grow th Source: Company reports, J.P. Morgan Payment Business Basics For a primer on the payments industry, please see Payment Processing: Payments Market Share Handbook published on June 5, 2009 by J. P. Morgan's Computer Services & IT Consulting analyst, Tien-tsin Huang When a buyer hands cash to a seller, the transaction is self-contained. If a credit (or debit) card is involved, however, several other parties become involved in the transaction, which we describe below: †¢ Issuer (Cardholder’s Bank). Card transactions start with a card issued by an issuing bank (e. g. Bank of America, Chase, et c. ) to a consumer.In terms of economics, the bank that issued the consumer’s credit card takes the purchase price, collects its interchange fee (in the US, ~170 -225 bps depending on the type of card), and passes the remainder to the†¦ Acquirer (Commonly the Merchant’s Bank). The acquirer provides merchant services to the merchant, handling all the card and/or electronic payment acceptance needs of the merchant. The merchant’s acquiring bank 5 †¢ Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 ccepts the payment, collects a merchant discount (generally in the 30-50 bps range in the US), and forwards the balance to the seller/merchant. Both the Issuer and the Acquirer pay a small (~7-9 bps each) fee to the Payment Network (see next entry). Merchant acquirer functions include: †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ Sign up merchants to enable them to accept card payments. Enable merchants to authorize card payments via the network. Pay all network and associated fees for a merchant’s transactions Facilitate clearing and settlement of card payments Provide incremental services, e. g. , sending out statements, etc. Payment network (e. g.Visa, MasterCard). As the backbone to the payments industry, networks connect various banks that need to process credit card payments with merchants and provide authorization, clearing and settlement services. Networks also set rules and interchange rates (earned by the issuing bank). Payment gateway. In the offline world, the payment gateway is the equivalent of a point-of-sale terminal that accepts the payment type (e. g. credit, debit card) and translates it into a format that can be accepted by the merchant acquirer. In the online world, the gateway generally connects an eCommerce site with the merchant acquirer.PayPal already functions as a Payment G ateway, largely as a result of its acquisition of VeriSign’s payment business, which had 144,000 customers when acquired in 4Q’05. †¢ 6 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 Figure 4: Example of a Credit Card Payment Processing Cycle Source: J. P. Morgan. How Does PayPal fit in? In most cases, when a PayPal user pays with a credit or debit card, PayPal functions as the Merchant (in Fig. 4).PayPal relies upon its merchant acquirer (usually Wells Fargo) to facilitate the transaction. PayPal the charges the merchant its fees, which on average represent a spread over what the acquirer charges PayPal. In addition, if merchants want, PayPal offers certain merchant acquiring services such as the means to authorize valid card transactions and facilitating the clearing and settlement of the transaction through the payment network. At this point, we estimate that PayPal’s merchant acquiring business comprises less than 5% of PayPal’s TPV. 7 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] om Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 PayPal Revenue Model Transactional Revenue PayPal’s business model involves collecting a percentage of revenue from each payment made on the system; this percentage has remained in the 3. 75%-4. 0% range since F’05. In F’08, PayPal collected 3. 86% of TPV as revenue. The following table summarizes the contributors to take rate: Table 1: Contributors to PayPal’s Transactional Revenue Take Rate Type Cross-border transactions (â€Å"CBT†) US sellers, non-CBT Int'l sellers, non-CBT Payment Gateway Website Payments Pro Source: J.P. Morgan estimates % of revenue ~35% ~33% ~25% ~3-5% ~2-5% Comment PayPal charges up to 100 bps higher rates for CB transactions; charges an additional 250 bps for currency conversion Sliding scale from 1. 9% based on volume Country-specific pricing; generally higher rates than US Acquired from Verisign in 4Q'05; limited growth since Monthly $30 fee for WPP product Figure 5: Our Estimates of Contributors to PayPal’s Transactional Revenue Int'l rev enue Pay ment Gatew ay Website Pay ments Pro Monthly Fees Cross-border rev enue US rev enue Source: J. P. Morgan estimatesMarketing Services and Other Revenue Several items are counted as a part of Marketing Services and Other revenue. These include: †¢ Interest earned on some customer balances. PayPal earns revenue as it receives interest on the balances of some non-US account holders. Note that US customer balances are held in FDIC-insured accounts or in a money market account; PayPal does not receive interest on these accounts. BillMeLater interest and fees. Interest and fees earned on existing BML client balances are classified as Marketing Services and Other revenue. †¢ Comparing PayPal Fees to Online CompetitorsPayPal’s fee structure is similar to those of its online-only competitors; both Google Checkout and Checkout by Amazon offer a similar package of fees depending on a merchant’s monthly sales volume; Amazon differs in charging a slightly different fee level for transactions under $10 as well as minimal cross-border support: both buyer and seller must have a US-based financial instrument to use the service. Both Google 8 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 nd PayPal charge roughly (in Google’s case, exactly) 1% more for cross-border transactions. See Table 2 for a summary. As a point of reference, we believe offline fees for accepting cards (aka merchant discount rate) average around 1. 9-2. 0% in the U. S. In March of 2009, Google announced that it woul d no longer offer a discount on payment processing on Google Checkout for Google AdWords advertisers. Table 2: Fees for PayPal, Google, Amazon Remain Similar Transaction Type/Volume Transactions under $10 Up to $3,000 / month Between $3K-$10K Between $10K-$100K $100K and above Cross-border PayPal Same as below 2. % of transaction + 30 cents 2. 5% of transaction + 30 cents 2. 2% of transaction + 30 cents 1. 9% of transaction + 30 cents Varies by currency but ~1% extra; payments with currency conversion add 2. 5% charge Google Checkout Same as below 2. 9% of transaction + 30 cents 2. 5% of transaction + 30 cents 2. 2% of transaction + 30 cents 1. 9% of transaction + 30 cents 1% of transaction Checkout by Amazon 5. 0% of transaction + 5 cents 2. 9% of transaction + 30 cents 2. 5% of transaction + 30 cents 2. 2% of transaction + 30 cents 1. 9% of transaction + 30 cents US only (seller and buyer must have US-based account)Source: Company websites PayPal’s Transaction Costs Set aga inst the ~3. 9% revenue take rate, the business faces two key expense lines that drive its transactional margins: transaction processing cost and fraud losses: Figure 6: F’08 Revenue and Expense Drivers for Aggregate PayPal Payment Volume % of Total Payment Volume, Aggregated across all TPV and Funding Methods 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 100% of PP rev enue 30. 9% of rev enue 1. 19% 7. 4% of rev enue 0. 28% 61. 8% of rev enue 3. 86% 2. 67% 2. 38% 2. 38% Rev enue Take Rate – Processing Ex pense – Transaction Losses = Transaction ProfitSource: Company reports, J. P. Morgan estimates Processing expense is driven by funding mix PayPal’s profitability is driven in large part by the mix of sources from which customers draw funds in order to pay on PayPal. In particular, when customers pay using a credit card, PayPal incurs a significantly higher cost of funds than when customers fund a purchase using their PayPal balance or an ACH transfer. 9 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imr an. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009Specifically, PayPal, similar to any merchant that accepts credit cards, is charged a variety of fees (the largest of these is interchange, which is the fee charged by the cardholder’s bank). For PayPal, we believe these fees amount to ~220-250 bps of payments funded with a credit card, with the range representing different types of cards and different geographies (interchange fees are generally higher in the US than across parts of the world, including Europe and Australia). Fees are slightly lower, but still in the 150200 bps range, if users choose a debit card rather than a credit card.By comparison, a payment funded from money already in a user’s PayPal account carries virtually no cost to PayPal. A payment funded though ACH carries a flat processing fee, usually less than 25c; this represents less than 40 bps on an ave rage PayPal transaction of $62. Figure 7: PayPal’s Funding Mix Merchant PayPal collects take rate (~1. 9% to as much as 5%), based on merchant volume and location (significantly higher if currencies converted) PayPal If funded via If funded from user’s PayPal balance, cost to PayPal is negligible Credit card, cost to PayPal is ~220-250 bps; PayPal then functions as Merchant in Fig. above. If funded via If funded via ACH, cost to PayPal is ~$0. 10-$0. 25 Debit card, cost to PayPal is ~150-200 bps PayPal’s cost of funds becomes more favorable Source: J. P. Morgan 10 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 Drivers of Funding Mix PayPal allows users to pay with both a credit/debit card and ACH; however, PayPal defaults to using an existing balance or ACH, and users must actively select to pay via a credit/debit card every time t hey use the service.The company has noted that customers generally shift toward a more favorable funding mix over time. Additionally, as PayPal adds new merchant sites, users of those sites begin with a heavier mix of credit card use. The mix for a merchant site begins to resemble that for PayPal overall as users’ familiarity with PayPal grows – generally, 12-18 months. Additionally, we believe BillMeLater, which is funded entirely through checks and ACH, can help improve funding mix for PayPal down the road. Other Margin Drivers PayPal margins have historically been in the 20% range, excluding corporate expenses.We believe several factors drive the variance between the 60%+ transaction margins and the high-teens overall profitability. Primary among these are: †¢ Customer service costs. Call centers as well as a variety of employees needed to manage any problems that arise in the payments process. We do not expect these expenses to show meaningful economies of sca le as the business continues to grow. Sales and Marketing. As PayPal has invested in growing its Merchant Services business, we believe that segment’s growth has been fueled by higher Sales spend. When the business matures, we believe there should be some scale economies in Sales. BillMeLater Basics PayPal acquired BillMeLater in 4Q’08. The service allows users to request transactional credit, rather than a revolving credit line as is the case with a credit card. BML offers consumers rapid credit decisioning on the basis of less detailed information (date of birth and last four digits of a Social Security Number) than necessary for more traditional financing. The majority of BML’s revenue is derived from consumer interest payments and fees, as shown below: 11 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 Figure 8: BillMeLater Econ omics as of Time of Acquisition % of TPV 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 2. 4% Merchant Fees + 6. 5% 3. 6% 2. 9% 3. 4% 2. 1% 4. 1% Cust. Interest Cust. Fees – Acquisition ; Income + Credit ; Cost of Funds = Transaction Profit Serv icing – Fraud Loss – Source: Company presentation, J. P. Morgan estimates Note: Cost of funds includes an implied cost of financing consumer receivables; transaction expense for processing funds is minimal due to funds being sourced primarily via ACHAt this point, BillMeLater’s presence on the eBay site itself remains minimal; the company has placed a 3Q’09 target for better integration of the business with PayPal, and we believe that, after fuller integration, eBay may choose to drive higher BML penetration on the Marketplaces business through, e. g. , promotional or interest-free financing. Complete integration of BML into all aspects of the PayPal solution is expected in 1Q’10. Charge-offs BillMeLater reports its net cha rge-offs as a percentage of the average receivables balance over the course of the quarter; in Q1’09 net charge-offs rose to 8. 95%, compared to 8. 5% during the part of the fourth quarter after the acquisition. Due to the transactional nature of the business, we believe BML has the capacity to continue keeping loan losses at a reasonable level; additionally, the company has expressed that it plans to focus on being more conservative with offers of credit in the near term, even at the expense of TPV growth. Nevertheless, we expect charge-offs to continue rising somewhat. Historically, credit card charge-offs have been correlated with the unemployment rate, as seen below. 12 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 Figure 9: Historically, Credit Card Charge-offs Rise when Unemployment Rises 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Q1'95 Q1'96 Q1'97 Q1'98 Q1'99 Q 1'00 Q1'01 Q1'02 Q1'03 Q1'04 Q1'05 Q1'06 Q1'07 Q1'08 Q1'09 Unemploy ment Rate Source: Federal Reserve, J. P. Morgan Credit Card Net Charge-off Ratio While we believe charge-offs at BML can be managed better, due to the transactional nature of BML’s exposure, we think rising unemployment is unlikely to leave the business untouched. Thus, if unemployment keeps going up, we would expect continued upward drift in charge-offs.PayPal’s Growth Strategy PayPal’s original growth engine was the marriage between PayPal and eBay, and the ability to drive higher penetration on the eBay site. We believe the low-hanging fruit in this regard has largely been gathered, but room for growth still exists along several areas of opportunity. 1. Growth Opportunities for PayPal on eBay Continued Geographic Expansion Can Drive Growth One of the biggest factors driving higher PayPal penetration on eBay has been geographic expansion in territories where the business is less mature than in the US.PayPal has had approximately five years of operating history in much of continental Europe, compared to nearly a decade in the United States. Table 3: PayPal Penetration as % of Addressable TPV continues to Grow % of addressable TPV Country US Canada United Kingdom Australia France Spain Italy Germany 2004 64% 60% 49% 7% 8% 5% 7% 2% 2008 80% 79% 74% 47% 43% 37% 36% 15% 2011(E) 84% 82% 81% 72% 61% 57% 56% 39% Comment Could see add’l boost from BML Penetration already nearly 60%; see below In terms of online activity, much of continental Europe is following in the footsteps of the UK, but several years behind.Penetration nearly doubled in F’08 alone Source: eBay Presentation, J. P. Morgan estimates We believe the 2008 experience in Australia, where PayPal penetration went from under 40% to nearly 60% over the course of a year, is reflective of eBay’s capacity to grow penetration via rule changes: the company rolled out rules mandating most sellers to offer PayPal as an option in 2008, and penetration grew by more than half over the course of the year. 13 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009Figure 10: Australia Demonstrates PayPal’s Capacity to Quickly Boost Penetration 60% 50% 40% 30% Q1'08 Q2'08 Q3'08 Q4'08 Source: Company presentation, J. P. Morgan estimates Additionally, several continental European countries have seen growth roughly in parallel since the rollout of PayPal in much of continental Europe in summer 2004. We See Limited Opportunity for Domestic on-eBay Growth Having already achieved notable levels of penetration on established sites, we don’t think PayPal will see significant additional increases in on-eBay penetration from current levels, especially in the US.However, as eBay increases the amount of buyer protections and begins to offer credit through BML, we thi nk the percentage of GMV that is addressable by PayPal can rise. Figure 11: PayPal volume as a % of Addressable GMV, 2008 GMV in $B 30 20 $29B $24B 10 0 79% 41% US Source: Company reports, J. P. Morgan Pay Pal Non-Pay Pal International One additional way to increase penetration on the site is for the company to offer increased incentives for sellers and buyers to choose PayPal as the payment method.These incentives can take the form of carrots (coupons, higher levels of protection) or sticks (e. g. , rules making other forms of payment more difficult to accept). PayPal has continually increased buyer protections on eBay for uses who pay with PayPal, with the levels rising from $1,000 to $2,000 in January 2007 and going up again to offer unlimited coverage in June 2008. We think offering higher levels of buyer protection – but only when paying with PayPal – remains a useful lever for increasing the penetration of PayPal on the eBay site. 14Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 im ran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 PayPal on eBay: Challenges Weak Marketplaces Growth Will Negatively Impact TPV Growth In line with recent declines in GMV, the percentage of PayPal’s TPV that is driven by on-eBay activity has been steadily declining in recent quarters, with 3Q’08 having represented the first quarter in PayPal’s history that saw a majority of TPV come from the Merchant Services part of the Payments business.Figure 12: On-eBay TPV Continues to Decline as a Percentage of Total 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 62% 58% 56% 56% 54% 51% 49% 49% 46% Q1'07 Q2'07 Q3'07 Q4'07 Q1'08 Q2'08 Q3'08 Q4'08 Q1'09 Percentage of TPV deriv ed on eBay Source: Company reports, J. P. Morgan estimates As eBay has struggled to improve GMV growth and faced headwinds from FX, the on-eBay portion of TPV has seen nominal growth turn negative in recent quarters, a s shown in the chart below; adjusted for FX the last two quarters have seen on-eBay TPV grow 5% and 3%, respectively.Figure 13: On-eBay TPV Growth Continues to Lag Off-eBay TPV Y/Y change 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% 1Q'07 50% 19% 57% 62% 66% 61% 57% 49% 35% 26% -7% 18% 18% 17% 17% 19% 12% -3% 2Q'07 3Q'07 4Q'07 1Q'08 2Q'08 3Q'08 4Q'08 1Q'09 On-eBay TPV, Y/Y Source: Company reports, J. P. Morgan estimates Off-eBay TPV, Y/Y We are currently modeling GMV to shrink by 14% in F’09, returning to slight growth in F’10 with a 1% rise. Even when looking only at non-Vehicles GMV, our model calls for an 11% decline this year, followed by a 1% growth in the next year.While we think eBay has taken many correct steps in improving the competitiveness of its Marketplaces segment, we remain concerned that the competitive environment 15 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 will make it difficult for eBay to reaccelerate growth and reclaim market share in future years. Additionally, we believe the shift to a frictionless eCommerce model is driving buyers to choose fixed-price formats over an auction approach.As this has the effect of moving from a space eBay controls into a much more competitive, multi-channel environment, we think it creates an additional headwind to growth. Cultural Headwinds in Some Geographies In addition to the above, two specific geographic regions have presented challenges for growing PayPal penetration: †¢ In Germany (and Austria, combined, estimated at ~15% of GMV), the majority of online payments are made using bank transfers, and PayPal has had limited success displacing this system. However, as Table 3 (above) indicates, PayPal’s penetration in Germany has been rising.In Korea (we estimate ~5% of GMV), where eBay recently announced plans to acquire GMarket and combine it with its current a uction. co. kr site, the predominant mode of payments is using escrow accounts. As in Germany, we believe penetration can rise over time as users become more comfortable with PayPal. †¢ Given the challenges in these two areas, which comprise approximately one fifth of eBay’s GMV, we believe it could be difficult for eBay to go significantly past the ~70% penetration threshold in the next five years. Bottom Line: We see ~$36B in F’11 on-eBay TPVBased on our current model of F’10 GMV (excluding Vehicles) of $43B, and an assumption of accelerating GMV growth to 10% Y/Y in F’11, we think PayPal’s oneBay TPV could hit $36B in F’11 (implying a 6% 3-year CAGR), with a range of $33B-$40B depending on more or less favorable assumptions. Figure 14: On current trends, on-eBay portion of PayPal would contribute ~$36B in F’11 TPV On-eBay TPV, $ in billions 40 35 30 25 2008 2009E Optimistic Current Model 2010E Pessimistic 2011E Source: Company reports, J. P. Morgan estimates 16 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 2. Growth Opportunities for PayPal off eBay PayPal’s growth through increasing penetration of off-eBay online commerce has been a key component of the business’s growth in recent years. We think the company retains significant runway to add customers. Historically, Focus on Smaller Sellers Due to its roots as a solution for payments on the eBay platform, PayPal has generally seen a higher penetration among smaller and mid-size sellers.This is partly due to the fact that PayPal has no fixed costs to a merchant, whereas accepting credit cards carries fixed costs. For a seller generating $100K in annual revenue, a $60$70/month cost for accepting credit cards amounts to nearly 1% of sales. Table 4: Economics of PayPal compelling for SMB market PayPal Setup fees Monthly Service Fee Monthly Gateway Fee Transaction fee Monthly Minimums $0 $0 $0 1. 9%-2. 9% + $0. 30 None Merchant Processor $0-$300 $20-$50 $10-$30 2. 0%-3. 0% + $0. 10-$0. 50/transaction $0-$30Source: Company reports, processor websites and J. P. Morgan estimates Figure 15: Payment Solutions P a y m e nt s o lu tion s †¢ †¢ †¢ D is a d va n ta ge s re la tiv e to P ay P al Buyer S eller C an n ot b e tra cked L im ite d p rote ction ag a in st lo ss/th eft R estricte d to virtu a l w orld †¢ †¢ L im ite d p ro te ction a g a in st lo ss/th eft R e stricte d to virtu a l w orld †¢ †¢ S lo w se ttle m en t/fu lfillm e n t tim e C ost/tim e of w ritin g che cks †¢ †¢ S lo w se ttle m en t tim e F ra ud riskC red it C ard Joh n Q Pu b lic 5012 345 6 7890 1234 †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ S ecu rity unce rta in ty of sm a ll b usin e ss site C re d it lim its In te re st co sts †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ H ig h tra n sa ctio n fee s – p ro hib itive fo r sm a ll m erch a n ts R e qu ire s m e rcha n t b ank a ccoun t F ra ud risk (card no t p rese n t) P ro ce ssin g tim e /co st S e tup co sts W ire (e . g. , W e ste rn U n io n ) F ee s U su a lly re qu ire s p h ysica l visit to ve n do r L im ite d a cce p ta n ce Source: J. P. MorganPenetration among Large Businesses Small, but Growing Whereas smaller sellers were PayPal’s bread-and-butter in the early days, the greater part of online commerce now occurs at larger sellers. This is especially true when one includes online travel, a category PayPal has pursued aggressively: whereas eCommerce has a fairly long tail of sites, the great majority of online travel is transacted at the large providers and OTAs. 17 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009Table 5: Penetration at top 50 onl ine merchants, by geography As of March 2009 Country USA UK Germany France Australia Penetration 42% 28% 16% 36% 60% Source: Company presentation and J. P. Morgan estimates Internet Retailer Data: PayPal’s Penetration Higher with Smaller Merchants Based on data from Internet Retailer, we estimate that 26% of the total sales volume on the top 50 online retailers in F’08 came on sites that accept PayPal. Consistent with PayPal’s past focus on smaller sellers, PayPal penetration among sites outside the top 50 is 39%, nearly 1. x the penetration among the top 50. Figure 16: Smaller Merchants More Likely to Accept PayPal % of internet retailers accepting PayPal, weighted by 2008 online sales Internet Retailer Top 50 I. R. Top 50, ex cluding Amazon Rest of I. R. Top 500 (##51-500) 0% Source: Internet Retailer, J. P. Morgan estimates 26% 33% 39% 10% 20% 30% 40% Note: Internet Retailer does not include travel sites in its rankings The following table summarizes PayPalâ €™s presence (including previously existing BillMeLater relationships) on the top 50 retail sites as ranked by Internet Retailer. 8 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 Table 6: 26% of Revenue at top 50 US eCommerce Sites is Addressable by PayPal 2008 Sales in $ millions Site Amazon. com Inc. Staples Inc. Dell Inc. Office Depot Inc. Apple Inc. OfficeMax Inc. Sears Holdings Corp. CDW Corp. Newegg Inc. Best Buy Co. QVC Inc. SonyStyle. com Walmart. com Costco Wholesale Corp. J. C. Penney Co. Inc. HP Home & Home Office Store Circuit City Stores Inc.Netflix Inc. Victoria's Secret Target Corp. Systemax Inc. L. L. Bean Inc. Macy’s Inc. Williams-Sonoma Inc. Gap Inc. Direct HSN Inc. Zappos. com Inc. Amway Global Overstock. com Inc. Avon Products Inc. 1-800-Flowers. com Inc. Nordstrom Inc. Buy. com Inc. Redcats USA The Neiman Marcus Group In c. Musician's Friend Inc. Blockbuster Inc. PC Connection Inc. Toys ‘R' Us Inc. Cabela's Inc. BarnesandNoble. com Inc. Scholastic Inc. The Home Depot Inc. VistaPrint Ltd. Saks Direct Nutrisystem Inc. Peapod LLC drugstore. com Inc. Nike Inc. Kohl's Corp.Verticals Multiple Office Supplies Computers Office Supplies Computers, Digital Sales Office Supplies Department Store Computers Computers Electronics Multiple Electronics Multiple Multiple Department Store Electronics Electronics Video Rental Apparel Multiple Electronics Apparel Department Store Home Apparel Multiple Apparel Multiple Multiple Health & Beauty Flowers Apparel Multiple Multiple Department Store Musical Equipment Video Rental Computers Toys Sporting Goods Media Media Home Office Supplies Department Store Food Groceries Health & Beauty Apparel Department Store 2008 Online Sales $19,170 $7,700 $4,830 $4,800 $3,642 $3,084 $2,693 $2,600 $2,100 $2,015 $1,993 $1,828 $1,740 $1,700 $1,500 $1,497 $1,414 $1,365 $1,333 $1,209 $1,072 $1,044 $1,040 $1,033 $1,030 $1,016 $1,014 $904 $834 $754 $750 $686 $657 $617 $565 $531 $526 $516 $500 $497 $466 $455 $437 $401 $381 $376 $373 $367 $366 $356 PayPal? No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No BML?No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Comment Ended BML relationship after PayPal Acquisition Could leverage BML relationship Could leverage BML relationship Site now owned by Systemax, a PayPal customer Could leverage BML relationship Could leverage BML relationship Could leverage BML relationship Could leverage BML relationship Source: Internet Retailer, J. P. Morgan estimates 19 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com N orth America Equity Research 26 June 2009 Off-eBay market share of 4. % in F’08 We estimate that PayPal’s $29. 5B Merchant Services TPV in F’08 (excluding BML) represented 4. 2% of the combined volume of eCommerce and Travel spend in that year. Our current estimates call for that number to rise to nearly 4. 9% of the total in F’09. Table 7: J. P. Morgan eCommerce and Travel Market estimates $ in billions Category Off-eBay eCommerce Travel Total off-eBay volume PayPal off-eBay TPV PayPal penetration F’07 311. 4 271. 9 583. 3 19. 9 3. 4% F’08 379. 0 329. 2 708. 2 29. 5 4. 2% F’09E 412. 0 342. 2 754. 2 37. 0 4. 9% F’10E 490. 8 405. 1 895. 9 50. 2 5. 6% F’11E 561. 4 458. 0 1019. 3 64. 2 6. 3% Source: Company reports and J. P.Morgan estimates We estimate that combined global online spend on eCommerce and Travel will exceed $1 trillion in F’11. By our estimate, PayPal’s Merchant services would need to access over 6. 0% of this volume in order to hit the low end of the target $4B-$5B PayPal revenue range indicated by the company. 3. Growth through BillMeLater We see several key effects on PayPal of the 4Q’08 acquisition of BillMeLater. In the near term, we think the addition could hurt profitability, while longer-term, we believe it can become a contributor to PayPal growth both on- and off-eBay. †¢ Minimal near-term TPV impact. BML accounted for 1. 2% of total 1Q’09 TPV.As such, we think it is important to note that the current impact of BML on PayPal results is likely to be somewhat small. Near-term growth likely slow. The company has stated that it intends to be very conservative in its approach to the tradeoff between growing BML volume and maintaining healthy credit metrics. Given the current environment, we believe this will significantly dampen growth in BML TPV through at least the end of F’09. Integration, portfolio losses to impact profits. PayPal’s segment margin in the last two quarters was 500 bps lower than in the same two quarters a year ago. The company has attributed this decline to the impact of integrating BML as well as charge-offs related to the unit’s loan portfolio.Medium-term, synergies become possible. Once consumer credit regains a measure of health, we think the company will begin to use BML as an additional tool to grow business, e. g. , by offering financing to incentivize users to pay with PayPal both on and off eBay. Target is convenience shoppers, not the underbanked. We believe eBay sees BML as an additional feature (or convenience) to attract higher-quality customers, rather than as a tool to expand its reach among customers who do not otherwise have access to credit. This approach appears consistent with the tradeoff noted above of slower growth in exchange for better credit metrics. †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ 20Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 †¢ Auto financing unlikely to be priority. As noted above, Vehicles sold on eBay have been largely beyond PayPal’s reach up to now. We think eBay sees BML’s core expertise in transactional credit for smaller amounts than involved in a car purchase. A significant expansion of the business to include auto financing seems unlikely in the near to medium term. Impact on margins temporary. eBay expects segment margins to revert to historical trends as BML is incorporated into PayPal more completely (e. g. the company expects BML to be integrated into the PayPal wallet by 3Q; additionally sales teams for BML and for Merchant Services are being merged to give clients a single touch point). †¢ BillMeLater Can Improve Funding Mix We think the impact of BillMeLater in the longer term will be felt most strongly on PayPal’s funding mix: BML does not accept credit ca rds, and as such faces a lower transaction funding cost than the PayPal business as a whole. As such, any portion of TPV that shifts from the historical mix of funding sources to BML will help lower PayPal’s cost of funds. Assuming, conservatively, that PayPal manages the business to have a similar take to the rest of PayPal, we estimate that each 1% shift of TPV onto BillMeLater would drive ~2 bps improvement in funding cost.Thus, if BML were to grow to 4% penetration of our mid-point F’11 scenario of $100B in TPV, it would drive ~8 bps improvement in funding cost: an incremental $80M contribution to the bottom line, or 5c of EPS. Table 8: Sensitivity Analysis: EPS Boost from Lower Transaction Cost as BML Penetration Rises TPV in $B, BML as a % of TPV, EPS impact in $ TPV BML % 87. 1 100. 5 113. 8 Source: J. P. Morgan estimates 1% $0. 01 $0. 01 $0. 01 2% $0. 02 $0. 02 $0. 03 3% $0. 03 $0. 04 $0. 04 4% $0. 04 $0. 05 $0. 05 5% $0. 05 $0. 06 $0. 07 Credit Cards’ P ain Could Be PayPal’s Gain Recently, the House and Senate passed bills restricting certain practices in the credit card industry. We believe that such steps could have several points of impact on PayPal.Crucially, if these rule changes make credit card issuers less generous toward consumers (e. g. , lower profitability drives issuers to lower the levels of rewards for credit card use), PayPal could benefit from funding mix improvement, as the incentives for customers to fund their accounts with credit cards, vs. debit or ACH, would be reduced. Further, we believe that, should credit card issuers try to recapture profitability with less consumer-friendly rules as well as more frequent fees, the quality of the user experience for credit cards will erode, making consumers incrementally more likely to use PayPal. 21 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] om Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 4. Growth Opportunity: Expanding Merchant Acquiring Business We believe PayPal currently has two strategic growth opportunities going forward. The company can drive greater adoption of the PayPal solution by continuing to establish PayPal as a brand for online payment, alongside incumbent players such as Visa and MasterCard. Alternatively, PayPal can attempt to improve its payment economics by becoming a scale merchant acquirer. This would allow PayPal to capture the ~30 bps on card transactions that we estimate it currently gives up to its acquirer.Finally, PayPal may attempt to skate along the knife-edge between the two above strategies, maintaining relationships with large acquirers such as Chase Paymentech while at the same time functioning as an acquirer for its smaller client base. PayPal as a Brand Chase Paymentech, the largest merchant acquirer in the U. S. and the largest processor of e-Commerce transactions, offers PayPal as an integrated payment option alongs ide well known names like Visa and MasterCard. As such, Chase Paymentech clients have the option to advertise acceptance of PayPal as a payment type. According to Chase Paymentech, clients that accept PayPal (in addition to credit cards) commonly see an increase in sales. We view this as an important indication that PayPal has potential to be a powerful brand off eBay.We believe PayPal’s recent stated focus on larger merchants suggests this is the more likely strategic direction for the company, as PayPal may not want to jeopardize its status as a partner to the large acquirers, which make it easier for enterprise-scale businesses to include PayPal as one of several payment choices. Can PayPal Become a Scale Merchant Acquirer? In our view, PayPal also has the potential to become a scale merchant acquirer, which could enhance its off-eBay presence, especially among smaller and mid-size merchants. As a merchant acquirer, PayPal would handle all of the card processing needs of a merchant, including directly processing other brands like Visa and MasterCard.We believe PayPal can offer very competitive rates to small merchants (who often pay heavy miscellaneous fees to acquirers), given its scale, allowing it to deepen relationships with merchants and potentially handle offline transactions as well. Smaller merchants (especially the ~87% of US merchants with annual card acceptances under $100K) tend to pay a much higher spread to their acquirer. Whereas such merchants account for ~10% of credit card volume, we believe they represent as much as $2. 5B in merchant acquirer revenue: more than 1/3 of the total revenue in the US merchant acquirer business. We think PayPal’s historical strength among smaller sellers can be an advantage in accessing this market. Chase Paymentech offers PayPal as an integrated payment option for its clients.Chase Paymentech was the largest merchant acquirer in the U. S. in 2008 with 22. 5% market share 22 Imran Khan (1-212) 62 2-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 Table 9: Top Ten US Merchant Acquirers, 2008 $ in billions Merchant Acquirer Chase Paymentech First Data BofA Merchant Svcs Elavon Fifth Third Processing Solutions Global Payments Wells Fargo Merchant Services Heartland Payment Systems First National Merchant Solutions RBS WorldPay Source: The Nilson Report. V/MA volume $567 $293 $283 $181 $165 $93 $91 $75 $51 $48 Market share 22. % 16. 9% 11. 2% 7. 2% 6. 5% 3. 7% 3. 6% 3. 0% 2. 0% 1. 9% As noted above, PayPal currently partners with Wells Fargo when it comes to handling non-PayPal branded transactions. One concern about a PayPal entry into the acquirer market would be whether it could successfully maintain its relationships with the other acquirers who currently offer PayPal as an option, and who would come to view PayPal as a more direct competitor. How Much is PayPal Worth? Combining the outlook outlined above, we believe PayPal TPV will reach $100. 5B in F’11; though somewhat more pessimistic or optimistic projections for the unit’s growth yield a range of $87B-$114B.At the midpoint, our estimate is for a 19% 3-year CAGR in Total Payment Volume. Figure 17: On current trends, TPV on pace for just over $100B in F’11 Total PayPal TPV, $ in billions 125 100 75 50 2008 2009E Optimistic New Model 2010E Pessimistic 2011E Source: Company reports, J. P. Morgan estimates Assuming the PayPal take rate remains just below 3. 9% (and assuming healthy growth in PayPal Marketing Services and Other revenue in F’11), our TPV estimate would result in $4. 1B in PayPal revenue. On the profitability side, we believe PayPal is likely to see segment margins shrink to 17. 2% for F’09 due to the continuing integration of BML; by comparison, segment 23 Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] omTien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 6 22-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 operating margin as reported by the company was 20. 0% in F’08. We think PayPal segment margins can expand back to above 18% by F’11. Figure 18: Segment income could reach $785M in F’11 PayPal segment operating income, $ in millions 1000 800 600 400 2008 2009E Optimistic New Model 2010E Pessimistic 2011E Source: Company reports, J. P. Morgan estimates Based on our scenarios for PayPal F’11 results, we believe the unit is likely to achieve approximately $450M in Net income. At a 20x multiple, this would yield a $9B valuation. Table 10: Scenario Analysis to Get to a PayPal Value in billions except where indicated On-eBay TPV Off-eBay TPV Total TPV Revenue Segment Margin [Unallocated Corporate Costs] Pro Forma Operating Income ($M) Tax Rate Net Income F'11 Earnings Multiple PayPal Value Source: Company reports, J. P. Morgan estimates Worse Case 33. 0 54. 2 87. 1 3. 57 17. 5% 4% 482 25% 361 16 5. 8 Average Case 36. 3 64. 2 100. 5 4. 09 18. 8% 4% 603 25% 452 20 9. 0 Better Case 39. 6 74. 3 113. 8 4. 61 20. 0% 4% 737 25% 553 24 13. 3 Comparative Valuation of PayPal Unit We believe it is instructive to look at several comparables when it comes to valuing PayPal. Specifically, Visa and MasterCard provide payment networks, while Global 24Imran Khan (1-212) 622-6693 imran. t. [email  protected] com Tien-tsin Huang, CFA (1-212) 622-6632 tien-tsin. [email  protected] com North America Equity Research 26 June 2009 Payments is a pure-play merchant acquirer, functioning in much the same way as PayPal does by providing an on-ramp for merchants into the payment system. Table 11: Comparative Valuation for PayPal $ in billions PayPal $67B 11% 1% $2. 70B 13% 17. 2% Some credit risk due to BML Visa $2,702B -1% 60% $6. 94B 6% 52. 9% None 20. 8 17. 1 15. 4 MasterCard $1,759B -9% 34% $4. 97B 0% 43. 2% None 15. 7 13. 4 11. 7 Global Payments N/A ($93B in F’08) N /A 4% $1. 59B 10% 19. 2% None 18. 4 15. 8 12. 5 CyberSource N/A N/A